Driverless metro crash a human error, experts say tech is a tested science

According to DMRC, the
crash happened because of human error as a trial train moved from the workshop
without testing the brake system that had been disabled
LATEST
NEWS : With
Prime Minister Narendra Modi set to inaugurate Delhi
Metro's magenta line, Tuesday’s incident of a train crashing into a
wall at Kalindi Kunj metro station has now raised concerns about the safety of
driverless trains and its technology. The line will be the first one to have
driverless metro in India.
Experts, however, believe that the technology implemented by
the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) is one of the best in the world and the
incident was not a technical but a human error.
The route will be implementing Computer Based Train Control
(CBTC) based signalling system, which compared to the conventional signalling
has the ability to determine the location of a train independent of track
circuits. “This is indeed a reliable and proven technology and we are doing it
in many countries safely. The radio linked system will enhance the efficiency
of DMRC,” said a senior official of a global railway equipment manufacturer.
According to DMRC,
Tuesday’s mishap occurred due to human error as a trial train moved from
the workshop without testing the brake system that had been disabled. As a
result of which, while the train was moving up the ramp for washing, it rolled
back and hit the adjacent boundary wall.
DMRC said that as per normal procedure prescribed when a
train enters the workshop, the brakes of the train are decommissioned so that
the train and its systems including the brakes can be freely checked. As per
procedure, once the train is again re-commissioned, the brakes should have been
tested by the maintenance staff in the depot before the train left the shed.
The train movement inside the workshop area is done manually and not by the
signalling system. But this was not followed by the staff in Kalindi Kunj.
ALSO READ THIS : 6 stocks that are trading 2,000 times above
their face value
Comments
Post a Comment